Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Potential involvement of chemicals in liver cancer progression: an alternative toxicological approach combining biomarkers and innovative technologies.

Potential involvement of chemicals in liver cancer progression: an alternative toxicological approach combining biomarkers and innovative technologies.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA (2014-07-06)
Ludovic Peyre, Nathalie Zucchini-Pascal, Georges de Sousa, Anne-Pascale Luzy, Roger Rahmani
ABSTRACT

Pesticides as well as many other environmental pollutants are considered as risk factors for the initiation and the progression of cancer. In order to evaluate the in vitro effects of chemicals present in the diet, we began by combining viability, real-time cellular impedance and high throughput screening data to identify a concentration "zone of interest" for the six xenobiotics selected: endosulfan, dioxin, carbaryl, carbendazim, p'p'DDE and hydroquinone. We identified a single concentration of each pollutant allowing a modulation of the impedance in the absence of vital changes (nuclear integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, cell death). Based on the number of observed modulations known to be involved in hepatic homeostasis dysfunction that may lead to cancer progression such as cell cycle and apoptosis regulators, EMT biomarkers and signal transduction pathways, we then ranked the pollutants in terms of their toxicity. Endosulfan, was able to strongly modulate all the studied cellular processes in HepG2 cells, followed by dioxin, then carbendazim. While p,p'DDE, carbaryl and hydroquinone seemed to affect fewer functions, their effects nevertheless warrant close scrutiny. Our in vitro data indicate that these xenobiotics may contribute to the evolution and worsening of hepatocarcinoma, whether via the induction of the EMT process and/or via the deregulation of liver key processes such as cell cycle and resistance to apoptosis.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide solution, 50 wt. % in H2O
Supelco
Dimethyl sulfoxide, for inorganic trace analysis, ≥99.99995% (metals basis)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, Vetec, reagent grade, 99%
Streptomycin sulfate, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ACS reagent, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, anhydrous, free-flowing, Redi-Dri, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, SAJ special grade, ≥95.0%
SAFC
HEPES
SAFC
HEPES
Sigma-Aldrich
HEPES, anhydrous, free-flowing, Redi-Dri, ≥99.5%
Supelco
HEPES, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, BioXtra, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, powder, BioXtra, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium pyruvate, Hybri-Max, powder, suitable for hybridoma
Sigma-Aldrich
Streptomycin sulfate salt, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Streptomycin sulfate salt, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Streptomycin sulfate salt, powder, BioXtra, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ≥99.5% (GC), suitable for plant cell culture
Supelco
Streptomycin solution, ~1 mg/mL in 1 mM EDTA, analytical standard
Supelco
Dimethyl sulfoxide, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, sterile-filtered, BioPerformance Certified, meets EP, USP testing specifications, suitable for hybridoma
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, PCR Reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, for molecular biology