Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel-based doublet compared with docetaxel alone for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed first-line treatment.

Meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel-based doublet compared with docetaxel alone for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed first-line treatment.

Clinical therapeutics (2014-09-27)
Ying Jin, Yan Sun, Xun Shi, Jun Zhao, Lei Shi, Wei Hong, Xinmin Yu
ABSTRACT

The benefit of docetaxel-based therapy in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel-based doublet compared with docetaxel alone for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed to improve with first-line treatment. Several databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. The end points were overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Data were extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager version 5.2. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs were calculated by using fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. Twelve eligible trials involving 2680 patients were identified. The intention-to-treatment analysis found that docetaxel-based therapy significantly improved overall survival (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83-0.96]; P < 0.01), PFS (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.71-0.89]; P < 0.01), objective response rate (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.37-2.18; P < 0.01), and disease control rate (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.09-1.55]; P < 0.01). In addition, a subgroup analysis based on type of combined drug showed that there were significant improvement in PFS and overall survival in combining docetaxel with targeted therapy. In addition, a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and thrombocytopenia was observed in docetaxel-based doublet therapy. Based on the available evidence, docetaxel-based doublet therapy seems superior to docetaxel monotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. More studies should focus on combining docetaxel with targeted therapy to identify patients who will most likely benefit from the appropriate combination targeted therapy.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Anhydrous Docetaxel, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Docetaxel, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Docetaxel, purum, ≥97.0% (HPLC)
Ifosfamide, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Ifosfamide, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydriodic acid, contains ≤1.5% hypophosphorous acid as stabilizer, ACS reagent, ≥47.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydriodic acid, contains no stabilizer, distilled, 57 wt. % in H2O, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydriodic acid, contains no stabilizer, ACS reagent, 55%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ifosfamide, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydriodic acid, 57 wt. %, distilled, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydriodic acid, 57 wt. % in H2O, distilled, stabilized, 99.95%